VMware Virtual Server Beta Released to Public.
Unlike Workstation, it cannot do all the fancy teaming, cloning, sharing, snapshotting... so for those of you who ask why anyone would buy workstation when the "Server" product is free... now you know. Workstation is the cutting edge of VMware's technology. Features seen in Workstation usually do filter down into GSX (now Server) and then into ESX. At least that's the way they explained it at VMWorld 2005.
VMware will have paid support available for the new Server product. And vmdk's (virtual disks) will be very compatible with ESX, providing a clear upgrade path to VMware's flagship product.
While GSX could be managed from VirtualCenter, it seems that this feature has been left out of VMware Server, though the product comparison page suggests that this feature will return in future releases. Vmotion is not an option, and I doubt it ever will be on a non-ESX platform. Vlans are still not an option. That would be my number one pick for new features! Vlans are a Godsend!
Memory wise, the specs say that you can assign up to 3.6GB per host. That's awesome, but keep in mind that GSX and this new VMware Server only does static memory allocation. Meaning that you cannot over-sell memory like you can in ESX.
Once I get this installed, I'll post some screenshots and any notes of interest.

4 Comments:
so where is the link to the GSX - Server comparison doc?
By Anonymous, at February 13, 2006 12:27 PM
Here it is:
http://www.vmware.com/products/server_comp.html
By Jim, at February 13, 2006 1:21 PM
I remember having run GSX on a Windows XP host (unsupported host OS). Has somebody tried to run VMWare server on Windows XP?
By Anonymous, at May 11, 2006 6:40 AM
Yep, it works like a champ. Check out this article to see how.
By Jim, at May 11, 2006 7:37 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home